law

Lawmakers Criticize Justice Dept. For Not Releasing All Epstein Files

December 20, 2025 The New York Times
Lawmakers Criticize Justice Dept. For Not Releasing All Epstein Files

Lawmakers accuse Justice Department of incomplete release of Epstein files with extensive redactions.

SUMMARY

Members of Congress from both parties criticized the Justice Department for not fully complying with a law mandating the release of all investigative materials on Jeffrey Epstein, citing heavy redactions and incomplete file reviews. Key lawmakers consider possible actions including impeachment or prosecution for obstruction of justice.

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Justice Department failed to fully comply with law on Epstein files release.
  • Extensive redactions and incomplete review of files acknowledged by DOJ.
  • Lawmakers consider impeachment, contempt, or prosecution for obstruction.
  • Democrats criticize administration for lack of transparency, especially on fully redacted files.
  • DOJ must report withheld records and legal reasons for redactions within 15 days.

CORE SUBJECT

Justice Department's incomplete release of Jeffrey Epstein investigation files

Lawmakers from both parties on Friday accused the Justice Department of failing to comply with a law requiring the release of all of its material on Jeffrey Epstein, citing extensive redactions and the department's acknowledgment that it had not finished reviewing or making public some files.

Representative Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky and one of the lawmakers who wrote the statute, said in a social media post that the release of the files "grossly fails to comply with both the spirit and the letter of the law."

Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat of California and the measure's co-sponsor, said that he believed a number of documents were missing, particularly a "draft indictment" that he said implicated others who watched or participated in the "abuse of young girls."

"It is an incomplete release, with too many redactions," Mr. Khanna said, adding that he and Mr. Massie were weighing whether they might impeach officials, move to hold them in contempt of Congress or refer them for prosecution "for obstructing justice."

Under the law, which Congress passed and President Trump signed last month, the Justice Department was required to release all of its investigative material on Mr. Epstein by Friday, though it was allowed to redact and withhold certain material.

But in a letter to Congress sent before the release, Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general, acknowledged that the department was not done reviewing or redacting files.

"I anticipate this ongoing review being completed over the next two weeks," Mr. Blanche said in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times.

Representatives Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrats on the Oversight and Judiciary committees, said in a statement that they were "examining all legal options in the face of this violation of federal law."

Except for Mr. Massie, congressional Republicans were largely silent after the release of the files on Friday night. But Democrats were critical of the administration's handling of the documents, particularly a 119-page file entitled "Grand Jury NY" that was entirely redacted.

"Simply releasing a mountain of blacked out pages violates the spirit of transparency and the letter of the law," Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, said in a statement.

Under the law, the Justice Department is required to send a report to the House and Senate judiciary committees detailing the records it withheld, a list of all "government officials and politically exposed persons" mentioned in the Epstein files and the legal reasoning behind redactions.

That report is due within 15 days after the release of the files.

KEYWORDS

Justice Department Jeffrey Epstein file release redactions Congress lawmakers legal compliance

MENTIONED ENTITIES 8

Thomas Massie

👤 Person_Male

Republican Representative from Kentucky and co-author of the statute

Ro Khanna

👤 Person_Male

Democratic Representative from California and co-sponsor of the measure

Todd Blanche

👤 Person_Male

Deputy Attorney General who acknowledged ongoing file review

Jamie Raskin

👤 Person_Male

Democratic Representative from Maryland, top Democrat on Oversight Committee

Robert Garcia

👤 Person_Male

Democratic Representative from California, top Democrat on Judiciary Committee

Chuck Schumer

👤 Person_Male

Democratic Senator from New York and Senate Minority Leader

Justice Department

🏛️ Organization

U.S. federal executive department responsible for law enforcement

Congress

🏛️ Organization

United States legislative body

NOTABLE QUOTES 4

"The release of the files grossly fails to comply with both the spirit and the letter of the law."

— Thomas Massie

Context: Social media post criticizing the Justice Department's file release

"It is an incomplete release, with too many redactions."

— Ro Khanna

Context: Comment on missing documents and redactions in Epstein files

"I anticipate this ongoing review being completed over the next two weeks."

— Todd Blanche

Context: Letter to Congress acknowledging incomplete file review

"Simply releasing a mountain of blacked out pages violates the spirit of transparency and the letter of the law."

— Chuck Schumer

Context: Statement criticizing the Justice Department's handling of the documents

Available Translations